Menu

Posts Tagged ‘Pulitzer Prize’

Your New BEAU: The Aristocracy of the Award Givers

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

The scandal is all over the news. The Pulitzer Board did not award a prize for fiction this year. For the first time in 35 years.

Well, this certainly is unexpected news. You would think, with the abundance of fiction oriented in a year, and with a jury that’s already weeded the pool down to three extraordinary candidates, “no award” should not be an option.

The three novels passed over by the Board are David Foster Wallace’s The Pale King, Karen Russell’s Swamplandia! and Denis Johnson’s novella Train Dreams.

There’s been some backlash. Fiction writer Jane Smiley (1992 Fiction Pulitzer Prize winner for A Thousand Acres) can’t believe there wasn’t a worthy book. Fiction Juror Susan Larson has expressed some anger that a choice could not be made after all of the work (reading up and weeding down the entrants) she and her two fellow jurors, Maureen Corrigan and Michael Cunningham, did.

And so we are left somewhat at a loss. And who is to blame? Who makes these kinds of decisions anyway?

Well, I always like to know just who the authority in any matter is and just what they’re credentials are, so I did a little googling to learn just how the Pulitzer Prize really works and how makes the decisions on this stuff. Here’s what I found.

The short version: There are the entrants, submitted for consideration by artists, authors, papers and publishers for the price of $50. There are the Pulitzer jurors, who slog through all of the entrants and select a handful of finalists, and there are the Pulitzer board members, who deliberate over the finalists and choose the 21 winners. 20 of the winners receive $10,000 dollars each, and one winner (the Public Service award in the Journalism category) receives a gold medal.

Each year, jurors (“The jurors are distinguished in their fields and include past Pulitzer winners.” Rich Oppel) are chosen and divided into groups of 3-7 people and assigned to one of the 21 categories.  The jurors will spend anywhere from a few days to a few months (depending upon the category) to select their finalists to submit to the Board. The Board, sequestered and sworn to utter secrecy, keeping all debate behind closed doors, deliberate and decide upon the most worthy ones.  One of their options, should they be unable to reach a majority decision, is to decide upon “no award.”

And the question of who the board members and jurors are? Who chooses them? Well, not much to be found on that, but the Prizes are based at Columbia University and the president of the University presides over the Board. So, there’s your answer? Here’s a bit more info on service terms for board members and jurors.

So, are you mad about this year’s Board’s indecision?

Well, it has been 35 years since a “no award” decision has afflicted us. Since then, we have invented the internet. And the Huffington Post wants to award the Prize by popular vote, so go here and weigh in.

If the silly Board can’t decide, then we’ll just have to decide for them!

 

Your New Beau.

Human Moments

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

One of the many reasons I enjoy reading is that books can be prisms through which I view the world.  Great works of fiction can help me understand and reflect upon any given period of time and circumstance.  A Passage to India by E.M. Forster is an insight into relations between the colonizer and the colonized in British India.  One Hundred Years of Solitude is an intimate portrayal of Colombian family and culture.  So many of the classic novels that we are both required and love to read have found a timeless place on bookshelves all over the world because their themes are universal and, well, timeless.

As I set out to write my second blog, I referred back to what I wrote last week on technological innovation and how it has transformed us as a society, in some ways detrimentally.  Snowballing off of that, I find it striking how many contemporary works of American fiction have started incorporating tech themes into their narratives.  A Visit from the Goon Squad had an entire chapter told via a PowerPoint presentation.  Await Your Reply by Dan Chaon is about how easily identities are swiped over the Internet.  Lisbeth Salander embezzles millions by computer hacking in the Millennium Trilogy.

Perhaps without consciously taking into account my opinion on the insidiousness of technology, one of the best books I read last year was Don DeLillo’s The Angel Esmeralda.  The book, a collection of nine short stories touching upon a multitude of themes, is entirely removed from the tech trends – so much so that reading on an eReader almost detracted from the ambiance of the book.  While it has mostly been excluded from Pulitzer prediction lists and best of short-lists, I hope that it is not left unnoticed.  Each story can be revisited over again, and even the earliest written story is relatable.  The themes of loneliness, isolation, sexuality, intimacy, anger, and youth make for an engaging read.  While no story is alike, a mysterious atmosphere permeates throughout the collection.

My favorite story is “Human Moments in World War III,” a futuristic depiction of two young men in orbit aimlessly (and mindlessly) firing at “targets” on Earth during a cataclysmic period of war.  They have a collection of “human moments” with them in their vessel – photographs, trophies, clothing, etc. to remind them of their past, and probably of their humanity.  Without any sense of time or place the characters rely on their languor to estimate the day of the week.  When they believe to hear a human voice crackle through their transmission, the doubt and confusion they feel is eerie to read.  The thought of human culture being so far removed compared with the isolating experiences of the two boys is so powerful, I thought about the story for hours after despite its mere 15 or odd pages in length.

The book stands out not only in the oeuvre of DeLillo’s work but in the array of books released last year because of the human moments – and I’m not necessarily talking about the one story.  If I am right, and fiction indeed can help us reflect upon and relate to each other, one need not look further than this book.  I promise you, the intimacy is in every paragraph and punctuation mark.  It reminded me how important, frightening, moving, and exhilarating relationships can be at times.   Not to beat a dead horse, but it really is remarkable how different relationships were when we relied not so heavily on technologically supported interaction but on human interaction.

Basically, if I’m ever stuck with a stranger in a spaceship sometime in the future launching missiles into the atmosphere, one of my “human moments” would definitely be this book.

– BB